Talk:Argument

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

Writing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Writing, a WikiProject interested in improving Wikipedia's coverage of content related to the fields of rhetoric, composition, technical communication, literacy, and language studies.WritingWikipedia:WikiProject WritingTemplate:WikiProject WritingWriting articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Index

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Discussion

The "Some Greeks are logicians and some logicians are tiresome; therefore, some Greeks are tiresome." is true because all the premises and the conclusion is true even though tiresome is a moral jugement . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boutarfa Nafia (talk • contribs) 15:02, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While unlikely, it's still possible that a hundred percent of the tiresome logicians aren't Greek, though. Which, if true, would also imply that none of the Greek logicians are tiresome. 198.48.202.76 (talk) 21:28, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1. "Some Greeks are logicians and some logicians are tiresome; therefore, some Greeks are tiresome." is not a valid argument. Form is Some A is B, some B is C therefore some A is C. You might as well argue "Some dogs are animals, some animals lay eggs therefore some dogs lay eggs.

2. An argument can be said to be valid or invalid, sound or unsound but neither true or false

3. Statements are true or false, not arguments — Philogos (talk) 00:59, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Technically no, because if you think about it, they are technically "Starting-Point Arguments", and from counterarguments, creates an entire dialogue of statements/arguments about the subject discussed, for example Wikipedia Talk Topics, begins with a statement, arguments and counter-arguments, and ends with a consensus, there is a whole debate about whether it is appropriate to consider statements as arguments, some say "No, they are not the same thing", while others think that they are considered arguments. 177.105.90.20 (talk) 20:54, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Disagreement (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 16:08, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Argufying" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Argufying has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 30 § Argufying until a consensus is reached. jlwoodwa (talk) 06:28, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]