Jump to content

User talk:Dhartung

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I will reply on this page unless you request otherwise
Please watch this page if you comment
If I commented on your talk page please reply there


Archive
Archives

AfD barnstar

[edit]
The AFD Barnstar
For your devotion to the AfD process, and your rescuing of articles by finding references for them. Keep up the good work.h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 14:17, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


AfD nomination of Troyster87

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Troyster87, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J Stalin (3rd nomination). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Troyster87 (talk) 08:58, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please, can you please help clean-up a page you created, James A. Baker (government attorney). If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thank you. --The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 00:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on political straw polls

[edit]

The article Straw polls for the 2008 United States presidential election and its associated pages were deleted as of 9 Nov 2008, and the deletions are now being reviewed. Because of your prior involvement, please comment at Wikipedia:Deletion review#Straw polls for the 2008 United States presidential election. Thank you for your consideration! 20 involved editors are being notified. JJB 19:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

There's a new AfD nomination for an article you've previously discussed. Please stop by to voice your opinions again. CzechOut | 11:19, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Incmag0702.gif)

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Incmag0702.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 05:04, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter (September 2009)

[edit]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Dhartung! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 92 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Ayesha al-Gaddafi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Paris Latsis - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:27, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
Issue 2 (January 2010)

Previous issue | Next issue

Content

Question

[edit]

Almost two years ago, you participated in the deletion discussion of the Otis AFB F-94C Disappearance page here. I've finally gotten around to fixing it to something worth while, so I was wondering if you would be willing to take a look at it here before I upload it to the main space. Thanks. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 19:48, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move

[edit]

Just a friendly notice that I have formally requested that three articles be moved at Talk:African-American Civil Rights Movement (1955–1968). Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 18:23, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why not

? –Howard the Duck 02:49, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have no objections. I have too little time to devote to Wikipedia these days. --Dhartung | Talk 03:02, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK. I'll be doing the changes. Thanks. –Howard the Duck 03:03, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Survey on quality control policies

[edit]

As part of a project funded by the European Commission (QLectives), we are collecting and analysing data to study quality control mechanisms and inclusion/deletion policies in Wikipedia. According to our records, you participated in a large number of AfD. We are currently soliciting editors with a long record of participation in AfD discussions to send us their feedback via a very informal survey.

The survey takes less than 5 minutes and is available at this URL. Should you have any questions about this project, feel free to get in touch.

Thanks for your help! --DarTar (talk) 10:09, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Friend zone

[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Friend zone. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friend zone (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shimer College GA

[edit]

On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, thanks

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:46, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Move

[edit]

I have proposed renaming the African-American Civil Rights Movement articles. You can join the discussion at: Talk:African-American_Civil_Rights_Movement_(1955–1968)#Proposed_Move Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 23:22, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Cullen

[edit]

I found a citation about Tim Cullen being elected to his old senate seat. Many thanks for putting out of date on the article-RFD (talk) 14:27, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, thank YOU! I would have, but didn't have the time. Cheers. --Dhartung | Talk 17:43, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Civil Rights Movement

[edit]

Hi, in my comment at Talk:African-American Civil Rights Movement (1955–1968)#Proposed_Move I've informally suggested Civil Rights Movement (United States, 1955–1968) (etc.) as an alternative. What do you think of that? (replying there, if you choose to reply, would be preferable to me - thanks). --Born2cycle (talk) 18:02, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

[edit]

Hello

I have recently nominated an article that you contributed to for deletion at

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fingerpoke_of_Doom_(3rd_nomination)

Seeker of the Torch (talk) 15:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Incase You Didn't Know

[edit]

Thank you for trimming headings as in [1].

One constructive criticism i would like to add is that wp:head encourages prepositions not to be used. Changing 'Parkour in popular culture' to 'Popular culture' is preferred. Thank you.199.126.224.245 (talk) 11:32, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Heh. In 2006, many articles used the heading "In popular culture". But thanks. --Dhartung | Talk 19:44, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

[edit]

Hello, Dhartung! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 04:15, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

[edit]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

  • This permission does not give you any special status or authority
  • Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
  • You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
  • If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 18:47, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The ABC of Sex Education for Trainables for deletion

[edit]

The article The ABC of Sex Education for Trainables is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The ABC of Sex Education for Trainables until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 06:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. As a contributor to this article (or more precisely, to S. R. Sidarth, which was merged into it), you may be interested to know I have nominated it for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shekar Ramanuja Sidarth (2nd nomination). Robofish (talk) 23:54, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your (and vorfeed's) sincere request for more information re the absence of the last chapter in any edition of the novel.

The fact is I have little hard evidence that an edition ending with the penultimate chapter actually exists. What I do know is that author Richard Adams stated in an interview that the eventual ending was championed by his editor upon original submission of the manuscript. According to the interview, after disastrous test readings, Adams reluctantly succumbed to the need for a revised denouement. I also recall (with less veracity) that he later modified the last chapter to mitigate its admitted contrivance, which may explain vorfeed's edition that omits the chapter title "Deus ex Machina," the colloquy with the reader, and Lockley's Who's Who entry (although it can be argued their addition had the opposite effect).

Martin Rosen, the producer of the film version which retains the ambiguous conclusion, also stated in an interview that he "felt the unfettered finale was more appropriate and true to the consistency of the tone of the film." Whether that implies it ever existed as the finale in book form is likewise ambiguous, I agree. The only other shred of proof I could dig up is the insistence of several readers on the web that they have (or recall) editions without the happy ending. (Poor form, I admit.)

I figured a compromise was to allude to the contrivance as an "addendum," nonetheless acknowledging its existence as the "official" ending. Of course, if either of you feel this is fantasy rationalization, I would not take any re-edit of my contribution as a personal affront. :-D –TashTish (talk) 17:15, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stanislav Petrov

[edit]

Hi, You have been involved in editing the article about Stanislav Petrov in the past. Following a discussion about splitting biographical data about the man involved from the article of the incident, I have been bold and made a cut at the changes required however I wanted to invite you to have a look at my edits on Stanislav Petrov and 1983 Soviet nuclear false alarm incident and make any changes you think are required. Thanks! --Deadly∀ssassin 23:36, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:G8-31-logo.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:G8-31-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 02:23, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1911 Encyclopedia Britannia

[edit]

Hi, the chances of you remembering or reconstituting this edit are slim, but I'll ask anyway!

The Herbert Hope Risley article is one of several bio articles that I am fettling at present, related via their connection to anthropologists of the British Raj. There is no problem in improving these things but a common issue is the use of the {{1911}} template without specifying the Britannica article that was referenced.

In this particular instance, I have been through the relevant EB volumes for Risley's name, through the Index volume and through the Anthropology section. I've also done a general search across the volumes (arguably a method of dubious merit, but my experience suggests around 70-75% successful). I can't find a mention of Risley anywhere except in connection with an article about Caste - and that has no biographical information.

Is it possible that the info which you added came from somewhere else? My bet would be the introduction to the William Crooke edition of The People of India, which certainly mentions all of the bio info that was in the article at the point where you inserted the content in the diff. I am inclined to remove the template from the article because it looks unlikely to apply now, given my ongoing work, but there may be attribution issues unless I can prove the point. - Sitush (talk) 08:42, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, don't worry about the above. I have spoken to some people and the template can now be removed. Sorry to have bothered you. - Sitush (talk) 11:33, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

Wow, I didn't know I could send someone a kitten on Wikipedia. I hope you like cats! I'm a librarian at Carnegie-Stout Public Library in Dubuque. One of my co-workers was excited to find that our blog is linked off of the Wikipedia article for the film F.I.S.T. Just for fun, I dug through the edit history to see who put the link there. If I'm reading this right, it was you. Thanks! Have a kitten!

Andrew Fuerste-Henry

AFuersteHenry (talk) 22:17, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you're welcome, but thanks to the library for the informational page. I love Dubuque, and it was fun to see bits of it in the movie! --Dhartung | Talk 23:18, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Contact (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ralph Reed and Christian Coalition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter

[edit]

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter

Volume I, Issue III
February 2012

To contribute to the next newsletter, please visit the Newsletter draft page.
ARS Members automatically receive this newsletter. To opt out, please remove your name from the recipients list.


[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Vanua Levu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm going to be working on The National (band) this week, and hopefully nominate it for GA some time next week. I just wanted to know if this is OK with you, as you are the original author. Thanks. ~dee(talk?) 14:05, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link in article 'Kalup Linzy'

[edit]

Hi. I tried to fix the dead links in 'Kalup Linzy', but there was one that I couldn't fix. I marked it with {{Dead link}}. Can you help fix the last dead link?


Dead: http://www.timeout.com/newyork/ViewSection.do?sectionId=art&fileName=559audio

  • You added this in December 2006.
  • I tried to load this link on 31 March, 3 April and yesterday, but it never worked.
  • I looked in The Wayback Machine and WebCite but I couldn't find a suitable replacement.

Please take a look at that article and fix what you can. Thank you!


PS- you can opt-out of these notifications by adding {{Bots |deny=BlevintronBot}} to your user page or user talk page. BlevintronBot (talk) 08:35, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As a contributor to this article, you may be interested to know I have nominated it for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hillary Clinton presidential campaign office hostage crisis. Robofish (talk) 20:57, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

JP Miller

[edit]

As explained in article, he is JP Miller, not J. P. Miller. Pepso2 (talk) 10:28, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I like to use authoritative sources, and many of them have it otherwise. This includes his LA Times and NY Times obits, his rights clearance listing at Dramatists Play Service, and although less authoritative, indications from IMDB that he was credited on screen as "JP Miller" as few as three times out of eighteen produced scripts. How would you suggest resolving this discrepancy? --Dhartung | Talk 06:14, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Métropolis (concert hall), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Queen Alexandra Range, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Antarctic Expedition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Y-ME National Breast Cancer Organization, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "Y-ME National Breast Cancer Organization"news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 02:59, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Ursula Martinez, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Ursula Martinez" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 20:30, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Freccia del Sole

[edit]

Where or what is Freccia del Sole? — O'Dea (talk) 18:00, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Huh, the source is no more, but it appears to have been the name of the first hydrofoil built by the guy who built the boat that was used as the Disco Volante. I can't determine what the source said, but while it was probably researched in the end it was a fanzine source. --Dhartung | Talk 21:19, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sam Yingling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pat Quinn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teflon (nickname)

[edit]

Hello. You participated in a 2007 discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teflon character. Consensus of that discussion was to keep the article, which has since been moved to Teflon (nickname). I note, however, that the article contains no treatment of the nickname as such. Perhaps it would be better recast as a stand-alone list. If you are interested, please see Talk:Teflon (nickname)#Is it a list? Cnilep (talk) 05:20, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Going My Way, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dissolve (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-a-thon in Madison

[edit]

I saw that you live in Janesville (based on your userpage), so if you're interested, I wanted to invite you to a humanities edit-a-thon in the Madison Public Library on Friday, April 25th (1:30–3:30). It'll be on the shorter side and is aimed at new editors, but I hope to see you there. More information is available on the 2014 UW Conference on the Public Humanities website. Let me know if you have any questions czar  04:02, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Disco ball, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WHAS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barbara Brandriff Crabb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defense of Marriage Amendment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chicago Theatre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Time Out. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rock River (Mississippi River), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sauk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help find additional sources for

[edit]

G. Edward Griffin

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-a-thon in Madison

[edit]
inline
inline
inline
inline

Dhartung, I'd like to invite you to an upcoming edit-a-thon:

ART+FEMINISM EDIT-A-THON

RSVP on the event page if you plan to attend or have any suggestions. czar 00:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You received this message because you are a member of Category:Wikipedians in Wisconsin. To opt-in to future Madison event messages, add yourself to the mailing list.

Proposed deletion of Joseph Suhayda

[edit]

The article Joseph Suhayda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

uncertain notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. H.dryad (talk) 13:20, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Basecamp (company) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Basecamp (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basecamp (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light21 13:16, 18 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Light2021 (talkcontribs)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

[edit]
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Dhartung. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Input requested

[edit]

Hello, because of an edit war on And you are lynching Negroes, and an on-going stalemate on its talk page, I am going through and notifying people who have previously worked on the article, and are still somewhat active to comment on the current state of the page. It is my intent to improve the quality of the discussion by broadening participation to more fully achieve consensus. Thank you. --evrik (talk) 19:02, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Press gaggle

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Press gaggle—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 22:46, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Basecamp (company) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Basecamp (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basecamp (company) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light2021 (talk) 21:16, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Basecamp (company) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Basecamp (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basecamp (company) (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Carl Fredrik talk 21:05, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Dhartung. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liz Garbus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Showtime (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Dhartung. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Dhartung. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Television with Antenna.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

[edit]

Hello Dhartung! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MusikBot II talk 17:03, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Guantánamo Bay/Draft" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Guantánamo Bay/Draft and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 16 § Guantánamo Bay/Draft until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 23:07, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Atlantica (trade zone) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atlantica (trade zone) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlantica (trade zone) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:41, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]