User talk:Rnt20

Re: Andor links

Hello Rnt20, I saw your comment and complaint about me adding unauthorised links. I did not add any link to Andor to articles. I have one on my user page but I never included it in the EMCCD article or any other entry site. The only modifiction I did was my linking to "impact ionisation". I am aware of the official policy and never tried to add commercial links. It must be is some misunderstanding that I am blamed for something I did not do. I am not entirely sure why I was notified about this violation since, it is not my IP, as far as I know. It's true, I work for Andor but the whole issue is not my doing. I posted the same comment on the talk page of user 62.172.106.114 who apparently did it. Best regards. SSN21 10:46, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Please note that the comments clearly related to 62.172.106.114, and no complaint was made about your use of the EMCCD page. Regards, Rnt20 10:59, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noted it was for 62.172.106.114 but for some reason I got notfied about a new message for me. Then I saw comments of you and other users and thought that I must have done something totally wrong but now I see it wasn't the case. Anyway, I don't think it was someone using my computer but most likely it was someone who works for Andor or is a huge fan of its products ;) Thanks for clarifying the issue. SSN21 11:40, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

fr:Image:Paris europe train map fr.png

Hello,

Thanks for your valuable picture on the Paris article. How about releasing this picture under the GNU FDL Licence? fr:Utilisateur:Teofilo-Folengo19:28, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

Sorry, my previous suggestion to upload the picture on "Commons" was wrong, as language-specific items should not be uploaded there.

Oops! I uploaded three versions to commons before I saw this comment! Rnt20 21:04, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Edinburgh in French is Édimbourg and Hamburg becomes Hambourg. Köln becomes Cologne, and Muenchen : Munich (as in English).

Maybe a solution would be to make the drawing multilingual by writing London/Londres Muenchen/Munich and so on. This way the picture could be OK on Commons.

template "PD-self" is a red link on French Wikipedia. You should change it into fr:Modèle:Domaine public. (But personaly, I think GFDL fr:Modèle:GFDLis more meaningful under French law).

Theo F 20:04, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You can pick-up the cities' names in several languages from this article : List of European cities with alternative names.--Theo F 20:14, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Images etc

I shall have a look at the possibility for doing this. The image would be a banner, but I would need to check the copyright status of images to be included first. I shall check it out in the next couple of days. I shall sort out my images with relation to the Commons in a few days' time as well – for various reasons, I am very busy at the moment and wiki has dropped down my list. Cheers for the note, smoddy 22:08, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Looks really good. I have refactored it slightly (with XHTML compliance – mainly), so that the coding is less obtrusive. Hope this is OK! Cheers, smoddy 13:31, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Instituto_de_Astrofísica_de_Canarias

I suggested the article you put on the translation page to become Wikipedia:Spanish Translation of the Week. You can add your support-vote there if you would like it to become translated.--Fenice 16:17, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

GFDL

Hi Rnt20. Please see my comment at Wiki content from the internet regarding the image you're proposing for adding a GFDL license to your webpage. Angela . 02:21, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

images

Hi Rnt20 Why do you not upload your pictures in Wikimedia Commons ? Every Wiki can use pictures from there. I have uploaded 'Mun flags frauenkirche.jpg' to Wikimedia Commons. That picture is great !! --gildemax 16:06:59, 2005-08-20 (UTC)

Oh, I thought I'd copied them all onto commons, but I must have missed that one. Rnt20 10:30, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

John Baldwin

I've left some Queens' dates on the talk page - please check, add and use if you wish. Linuxlad 16:03, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Astrophysical Journal

Hi there. Just spotted you "shadowing" my changes to Nature and Science. :) On related travels I've just been to the article on scientific journals, and spotted that the Astrophysical Journal seems to be getting a bit of a raw deal (see my comment in the talk page). As you're an astronomer, I thought you might like to redress this slur (I'm only an oceanographer, an know nothing of the heavens above). Cheers. --Plumbago 09:52, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

2005 Kashmir earthquake

Indian subcontinent earthquakes list Thank you for your contribution at 2005 Kashmir earthquake.
Please keep it up!!! - P R A D E E P Somani (talk)
Feel free to send me e-mail.

06:46 10 October 2005

Dome C

I appreciate your edits. I think you may be interested in helping with SETI@home (see discussion on my talk page). Cheers -- Svest 20:21, 25 October 2005 (UTC) ^{Wiki me up}[reply]

CMB

Hi, I'm trying to improve the cosmic microwave background page to contain more information about CMB physics and such. I have made a new cosmic microwave background experiments page which contains some of the material from the old page. If you have the time, it would be great if you could help to improve these pages. In particular, I am trying to add a short section to the main CMB page about the design of CMB experiments, while moving the list of experiments to the experiments page. I know something about data analysis, but very little about experimental design. If you have anything to contribute to this, that would be much appreciated. Thanks. –Joke 17:33, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Italian user page

Hi, i'm an italian wikipedian and I saw your userpage on it.wiki: unfortunately the redirect between different wikipedias not work. I suggest to put a plain link on italian user page that links here. Regards --Jacopo86 16:46, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Huygens surface sum.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Huygens surface sum.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. NaconKantari e|t||c|m 20:41, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements to Punt (boat)

Thanks for your work today on Punt (boat). I am sure these are good faith edits to improve the article, and the new picture is very welcome, so please don't take it amiss that I have tidied it up a little. In your several attempts to get the flow of the pictures right, you have broken up the flow of the text and section headings, so that some of the material about punting on the lower Thames is now in the Oxford section. I don't know if I have got it right even now, and your help is very welcome, but if & when you do any more work on this article can you please keep the headings and text consistent? Many thanks Thruston 22:32, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ami_sep_2005.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ami_sep_2005.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 04:15, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Mrao_ami_sba.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mrao_ami_sba.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 10:33, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PNA/Physics comments moved

Hey there. I notice you changed a comment on Optical interferometry from your name to mine. However, the comment is indeed yours. It was posted to Wikipedia:Pages needing attention/Physics; I'm putting it on its talk page as part of a redo of PNA/Physics in support of Wikipedia:Cleanup process/Cleanup sorting proposal. I have reverted the comment change. Thanks. Alba 20:13, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1C?

Someone has started a stub for 1C, and someone else has set a delete tag 15 minutes later.

I think that later surveys referred to

Ryle M, Smith F G & Elsmore B (1950) MNRAS vol 110 pp508-523 'A preliminary survey of radio stars in the Northern Hemisphere'

as if it were 1C. But this is just a 'guess'. Do you have any access say to 2C and 3C to check what they meant by 1C? Linuxlad 11:13, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am afraid I know nothing about this. I spotted this text in Google though:

The 1C catalog listed about 50 radio sources, detected at 3.7 m with a fixed meridian interferometer. (Later most of the sources from 1C were recognized to be the effect of confusion, i.e. they were not real objects.

Ryle M., Smith F.G., Elsmore B. A Preliminary Survey of the Radio Stars in the Northern Hemisphere, MNRAS, 110, 508-523 (1950).

and:

Smith, F. Graham (1923-) Astronomer who joined Martin Ryle's radio group in 1946. He observed Cygnus A using a Michelson interferometer at 80 MHz. He also built the Long Michelson Interferometer at the Old Rifle Range in Cambridge in 1950. This device operated at a wavelength of 3.7 meter, and was operated using Ryle's phase switching technique to compile the 1C survey in 1950. He also used the interferometer to measure the electron Eric Weisstein's World of Physics density in the ionosphere Eric Weisstein's World of Astronomy (c.f., Evans). In 1977, his book Pulsars was published (Sullivan 1984, p. 413).

I have updated the 1C page accordingly. Rnt20 12:37, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Those articles look very useful. Good Work.

However, I wonder if the Russian one hasn't in turn 'confused' 1C and 2C (the text of their article seems out of order). (2C was the real and acknowledged turkey, going far too 'deep' (in fu terms) for the angular resolution). Linuxlad 13:16, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Interferometry feetnotes -

1) do we need an article on phase switches.?

2) I see there's now quite a good article on Hanbury-Brown & Twiss. I remember being intrigued by this when the subject came up in 2nd year optics(*). I was especially intrigued by the prediction that the stats of electrons would be different from those using photons, which were already expected to be puzzling enough at low intensities. At the end of the year I couldn't find any who wanted to explain the notes I'd taken back to me. (*The year was 1967 and the lecturer had been John Shakeshaft the radio-astronomer).

I think the difference comes from the fact that electrons are Fermions (which have Fermi exclusion, so multiple electrons cannot be in the same state), whereas photons are bosons (so multiple photons prefer to be in the same state). It is the boson nature of the photons which causes them to cluster in the same states, giving the measurable correlation in an intensity interferometer. Not sure about all the details of this. Rnt20 18:04, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's the one bit I'd latched on to :-) but when you took all that in to account with the splitting stats at low intensity... (I hadn't apprecaiated until I read the article that the crucial confirmatory expeiments in both these areas were 10 or more years in the future, so this was HB&T pushing the boat out) Linuxlad.

Libya

Hi,

I've recently added Libya to the list of featured article candidates. Overall the candidature is going well with many of the objections now sorted out. The final concrete objection is with the article's prose. I have been the main contributor to the article and have been looking at it for the previous 9 - 10 months. My eyes no longer see it freshly, so I am not a suitable copy-editor!

To meet the final demand of copy editing, I have been advised to ask different people to edit parts of the article.

I would really love to get this article featured as you can probably see from the page's history! I've worked very hard on it and I see this as possibly being the final hurdle.

You can see the prose objections, mostly raised by Sandy, on the candidature page. If you have the time, please choose a section (Politics, Religion, Culture etc.) and ~~copyedit~~, ~~perfect~~, ace it! I would be very grateful with any help I can get.

Thanks a lot,

--Jaw101ie 17:00, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of observatories

Hi, I've been working on this article lately and I noticed that you've done quite a bit of work in the area. I'm wondering what you think about adding space based observatories (like HST, Spitzer, etc.) to the list. There was a comment regarding this on the article's talk page a few years ago but there was never any debate about it. I'm in favor of adding the space-based astronomical observatories but I just wanted to get another opinion first. Let me know what you think. Thanks! --Nebular110 19:51, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a good idea. At the moment the list seems to be a random list of a few of the well known observatories and a lot of fairly obscure ones. It would seem sensible to add a few more of the more famous observatories, including space ones. Rnt20 07:11, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there are many obscure observatories on the current list. Do you think some of the really obscure ones, like those owned by individuals or small astronomy clubs, should be removed?

My eventual goal is to make this a featured list. Obviously this is still a ways off, the lead especially still needs a LOT of work. Right now we just have name, date established, and location for the columns. Is there any other information you think would add to the list? --Nebular110 18:09, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Something which would be very nice (but not essential) would be a link to an aerial photo for each one on www.wikimapia.org or maps.google.com. Keep up the good work! Rnt20 19:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

H5N1

Thanks for desiring to help out at the H5N1 suite of articles. You might be intereted in H5N1 clinical trials. Vaccination corporations can not be expected to tell the unbiased truth. They are trying to make money. WHO, CIDRAP, CDC are examples of unbiased sources. No one knows what mutations will occur that could create a pandemic strain, so no pandemic vaccine can be known to be effective until AFTER one or more pandemic strains evolves. H5N1 and H2N3 genes could mix creating both a pandemic H5N1 strain and a H2N3 pandemic strain. My point here is no matter what a company spokesman says, until there exists a pandemic strain it is unknowable what if anything any of our vaccines will do against it. WAS 4.250 14:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Paris_europe_train_map_de.png

Hi, in the translation of this image is still a typo: The german translation of Zurich is Zürich. Can you correct it? --Prolineserver 20:50, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected it -- thanks for spotting that. Rnt20 20:27, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nobel Medal

Hi Rnt20, Are you the guy that introduced a photo of the nobel prize medal? If so, pls can you clarify the copyright status? Best regards, bunix 08:32, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the photos are public domain, but User:Mormegil claims that the sculpted designs are copyrighted so that the photos cannot be used on wikipedia. I don't know whether this is really true -- these are essentially photos of sculptures -- at what point does something become copyright? Are all photos of sculptures (or of buildings whose designs were copyrighted by the architect) also copyrighted? Rnt20 16:54, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reason why I reverted your edits to Point source

Rnt20, I reverted your edits in the Point source article because they really should be in the Point source (disambiguation) page. That is why the the top of the Point source article has a link to the Point source (disambiguation) page.

The Point source article is intended primarily to focus only on pollution point sources. The other uses of that phrases are covered in the disambiguation page. If you think the disambiguation page needs more discussion of other uses of the phrase, please edit it. Regards, - mbeychok 18:19, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

:Yes, now that I have seen what you did by links to the Wiktionary, I understand your point of view. Meanwhile, there is a discussion on the Point source discussion page about the pros and cons of the article being specifically focused on pollution sources, as differentiated from radiation, optic, wave, and other uses of the phrase "point source". I would very much appreciate it if you would enter into that discussion. Thanks in advance, - mbeychok 21:31, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I struck out my above comment because I placed it here by mistake. Please excuse me. - mbeychok 22:19, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation

STOP. Before you do any more damage, please read Wikipedia:Disambiguation and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages). You don't seem to understand disambiguation, and as a result you are making bad edits that create more work for everyone. If you have changed the wiktionary links to point to the disambiguation page, please change them all back (or change them to point to an article) before you do anything else. It is never acceptable to deliberately link to a disambiguation page. Disambiguation pages exist to catch erroneous links; cases where someone makes a link without bothering to check that they are linking to the correct article. The ultimate goal is to have zero links to each dab page (except for dablinks at the beginning of articles, etc.) Disambiguation pages are not to contain any information beyond that needed for a reader to quickly find the link to the page they are looking for. --Srleffler 16:10, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As mentioned before, there is a big problem here -- there is no suitable "general page" for point source which covers all the different types, so the only option is to link to the disambig page. I tried to create a "general page" for point source but the changes were quickly reverted. Rnt20 11:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please come join the discussion at Talk:Point source. We need to decide as a group how best to handle this material.--Srleffler 07:01, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Missing images in Commons

Hello Trn20, you are doing a great job in the commons space, but could you also add the VLBI pictures <Image:Vlbi data playback.gif> and <Image:Vlbi data record.gif> so that they can be used in the translations of the VLBI article. Thanks. Duckysmokton 08:52, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I didn't do this after having received complaints for putting images containing English text (like these) on the commons before (the commons should be language-free). Feel free to edit the pictures as you wish and put them on the commons (I cannot do this at present as I am abroad). Rnt20 14:26, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Indy cover 22 july 2006.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Indy cover 22 july 2006.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. Arniep 15:35, 24 October 2006 (UTC) -- Arniep 15:35, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

The article American English, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup.

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page.
If you do not want to receive bot-generated messages on your talk page, please consider using the nobots template on your user talk page

images images image (don't worry the madness will never end)

Hi, Could you please look at your talk page on wikinews? One of your images (from long long ago, so you probably have no idea by this point in time) are missing source information and may be deleted. Thanks, happy editing. Bawolff 04:02, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Volkswagen and Biodiesel

Hello, About a month ago, you added a chart that listed which Volkswagen models are capable of running on neat biodiesel. Because your chart does not seem to have a source, and because it contradicts an official VW publication, we are considering deleting it. Can you please skip over to talk:biodiesel#Biodiesel_and_Volkswagen and tell us where you found it? Thanks Christopher 16:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Union Flag

This is a terribly difficult area throughout Wikipedia, and I am quite frankly sick to the back teeth of it, but just let me explain part of my reasoning in this case. The Union Flag was invented in the early 17th century, and only reached its present design in 1801. To apply it to the High Middle Ages is just bizarre in the extreme, and frankly laughable in a supposèd encyclopaedia. Secondly, both England and Scotland (and their flags) still exist, unlike some other political units from that era. --Mais oui! 08:33, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Cam_one-mile_cen.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Cam_one-mile_cen.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MER-C 10:31, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nobel prize medal.jpg

Hello Rnt20, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Nobel prize medal.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Rnt20. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 02:37, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Schoolreunion2.jpg

Hello Rnt20, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Schoolreunion2.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Rnt20. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 08:33, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paris europe Train Map

Hello, it would be kind of you to modify when possible the map [1] to integrate the new east-european fast train line (LGV Est) between Paris and Strasbourg, opening today. The new travel times indicated in the english article are correct [2]. The green line (3hours) should also be a bit more west in Brittany (around the middle), Vannes and Saint-Brieuc are situated at 3h00 train from Paris. Western Normandy is also at less than 3h from Paris (Cherbourg : 2h50).Thanks in advance ! ;-) Clicsouris (French Wikipedia)

Sorry -- only just spotted this. I'll look for the files tonight. Rnt20 06:40, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can't find the original file on my computer, so I'll try editing the bitmap. Rnt20 19:28, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Multiple aperture telescopes

I first created Category:Interferometric telescopes to contain all of the articles in both Category:Multiple aperture telescopes and Category:Interferometers, as the two category overlapped significantly.

I then discovered that all multiple aperture telescopes were used either partially or completely as interferometers.

Actually, this statement is not entirely incorrect -- some multiple aperture telescopes such as XMM-Newton, MAGIC (telescope) etc. are not interferometers, but they are multiple aperture telescopes. I don't particularly mind the category multiple aperture telescopes being deleted though -- it's a bit of a random collection really. Rnt20 12:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My plan is to speedy delete Category:Multiple aperture telescopes as empty.

As I usually do much of the category maintenance for Wikipedia:WikiProject Astronomy and Wikipedia:WikiProject Astronomical objects, I did not think that anyone else would be working on the categories or would object, However, if you object, then I am willing to run a formal proposal through Wikipedia:Categories for discussion.

(Also, based on experience, category talk pages usually are not used for discussion.) Dr. Submillimeter 08:28, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I think I understand what is meant by "multiple aperture" here, but I am not certain. Some telescopes are made up of segmented primary mirrors, but all of these effectively function as a single aperture. Is that why MAGIC (telescope) was in this category? (XMM-Newton functions as three telescopes strapped to each other, but the webpage describes each subunit as containing 58 primary mirrors.) Dr. Submillimeter 13:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ooty Radio Telescope

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Ooty Radio Telescope, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.ncra.tifr.res.in/ncra_hpage/ort/ort.html. As a copyright violation, Ooty Radio Telescope appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Ooty Radio Telescope has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Ooty Radio Telescope and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Ooty Radio Telescope with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Ooty Radio Telescope.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. 129.97.79.144 20:03, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Critique

Hello Rnt20! I was curious if I could kindly ask you to look over my page entitled "Watershed Protection". It appears that you are a very active user and I think that you could offer some useful advice. I'm trying to improve myself as a communicator and feel that it would be good if I could get some feedback of any sort from the community!

Thanks!

 -Prevero-

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Chaj-02-preview.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chaj-02-preview.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Hubble Space Telescope

Hubble Space Telescope has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. --Kaypoh (talk) 05:03, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Schoolreunion2.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Schoolreunion2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bragen 23:10, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Anthony head mr finch.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Anthony head mr finch.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:NavComm1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:NavComm1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:17, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just for info, I've moved this to File:BBC Domesday Project Community Disc initial screen.jpg. -- Trevj (talk) 09:39, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice: used one of your images

Hi bob, I just wanted to let you know that I used one of your images in one of my blogs: [3]

I hope that you are ok with me doing this, and that the attribution (as of Austrian law) is enough for you!

All the best Tam Hanna

P.S. Should you have any questions, please get in touch at tamog AT gmx POINT at. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.178.74.20 (talk) 18:05, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine -- it's public domain. Rnt20 (talk) 10:36, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to let you know! Big thank you for the image! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.178.74.20 (talk) 01:47, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please help!

Hi Rnt20, I am in great need of help: I need the EastAngliaUnivShield.PNG‎ file redrawn in order to be used on the University of East Anglia article (current image = horrific quality). Your work in terms of the St. John's College coat of arms truly impressed me, so if you have time for a quick challenge and are eager to lend a help hand, I would be extremely grateful. Many thanks! AlpsAlpsAlps (talk) 23:33, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Artificial satellites currently orbiting Sun

Permission problem

Hi. There is a permission problem with your upload File:Aat_telescope.jpg. Could you please help by clarifying the issue (an OTRS-ticket would be good). -- Cecil (talk) 23:44, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PLate OPtimizer

Hello, I'd like to ask you and a couple of other editors who might be interested in amateur astronomy technology to look at this article and tell me if I've achieved general notability guidelines WP:N as it is presently written. If it interests you I'd appreciate if you'd take a moment to look at it and if not, thanks for taking the time to read this note.Trilobitealive (talk) 02:06, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:UM infrared comparison.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:UM infrared comparison.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --J Milburn (talk) 09:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright issue

Hi, may I enquire if you are either John E. Baldwin or Christopher A. Haniff ? As you are the author of the first edit of History of astronomical interferometry, which is a copypasta from this article, if you are not one of them (or both of them, actually…) there must be a problem of copyright violation, so it would be better IMO to make it clear (maybe in the discussion page ?) that you have the authorization of both authors (and maybe even the Royal Society ?)… Skippy le Grand Gourou (talk) 13:27, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, after reading your discussion page, it seems that this is not the first time you use copyrighted material. Considering that I will not ask you your identity card anyway, I prefer to file a copyright violation issue and let you deal with admins. Skippy le Grand Gourou (talk) 13:36, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here it is :

Copyright problem: History of astronomical interferometry

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as History of astronomical interferometry, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from www.mrao.cam.ac.uk/research/OAS/papers/tyoung.ps, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:History of astronomical interferometry and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, History of astronomical interferometry, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:History of astronomical interferometry with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:History of astronomical interferometry. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:History of astronomical interferometry saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Skippy le Grand Gourou (talk) 13:37, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Rnt20! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

John E. Baldwin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:00, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Review article

Hello Rnt20. I was wondering if you could review the Italy article and please update its article status, since the current one is very old. It is currently B-class, and I was wondering if you could see if it would be the same, better or worse. Reply--Theologiae (talk) 12:10, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:46, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Cyberman2005.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cyberman2005.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:39, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

-- yes, the cyberman screenshot has been superceded by a newer screenshot -- File:Cyberman.jpg Rnt20 (talk) 17:29, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the Public Policy Initiative Assessment Team wants You!

Hi Rnt20, I got your name from the Editorial Team participant list, and wanted to tell you that we will be testing out assessment metrics in the Wikiproject: United States Public Policy, and I was hoping you would be interested in assessing articles with the Public Policy Initiative. There is more info about assessment on the 9/13/2010 Signpost. If you're interested or just curious you can sign up on the project page or just contact me. Thanks! ARoth (Public Policy Initiative) (talk) 22:24, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Astronomical interferometer wavebands

Would you please help out with Wikipedia:RDS#Astronomical interferometer wavebands? Thank you! 99.24.223.58 (talk) 04:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC) Someone else answered; I hope you can verify the correctness. 99.24.223.58 (talk) 19:23, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For info

The name Iles Malouines was conferred much later than the English equivalent, the Falkland Islands. I don't disagree with your edit but its likely to be reverted. Wee Curry Monster talk 10:16, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for the Wikipedia Picture

Hello, My name is Duane Hurst and I recently made a free (non-commercial) English web site to share information with people. I added links to your Wikipedia/Wikimedia freeware picture (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mun_flags_frauenkirche.jpg). I also gave credit to you on my web pages for your work. Thank you for sharing with the public. My website is:

http://www.freeenglishsite.com/

I add pictures such as yours to one of the following major sections of my site: 1. World section - contains information and over 10,000 images of every world country and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/index.htm

2. USA section - contains information and images of every USA state and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/usa/index.htm

3. English section - "Mel and Wes" lessons in conversation format. Stories are located in various USA states and world countries such as China, England, Germany, Japan, Mexico and Thailand. Each lesson has many slang terms and idioms, which I link to my Slang Dictionary. This eventually will have over 5,000 terms. Currently, it has about 3,000 slang and idioms. I regularly add new lessons and slang terms. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/lessons/index.htm Slang Dictionary link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/slang/Eslang_a.htm

Prior to retirement, I taught English at several private and public universities in the United States.

Please share this free site with your friends. I hope all will enjoy the pictures and find the English information useful. Sincerely, Duane Hurst in Utah, USA

Email address: duanerhurst@freeenglishsite.com --75.162.206.53 (talk) 14:04, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atmos struct imaging.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Atmos struct imaging.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:34, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Speckle aperture masking.png missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Speckle aperture masking.png

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:07, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Atmos struct imaging.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:27, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Cam gown.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:46, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Campo dei Miracoli overview.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:57, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Astronomical interferometer figure

Hi, I wonder if you could modify your figure File:Interf diagram.gif a bit, to make it clearer that the optical path length to the focus is the same for all incoming parallel beams? After all, that is the fundamental principle which makes an interferometer work, but in your figure it appears as if some light rays have a much longer path to the focus than others (and would therefore arrive out of phase). In other words, your figure doesn't really show the proper location of the parabola's focus; the true focus is a lot closer to the parabola. Cheers, AxelBoldt (talk) 22:57, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How did you create the speckle pattern examples?

I was searching for how to create simulated speckle short exposures to test an image reconstruction algorithm. You generated some of these images and I would ask for an explanation on/link to how you generated them. (I mean the negative images you created for the astronomic seeing page.) I don't want to just use real data because I do not have "known good" information about what should be the outcome of the reconstruction. Although I do not have that many time left to complete the project, I do have enough coding and documentation (I'm writing a paper on the (I hope improved, thought it is not enough of it coded to say for sure, it should at least make "one-click/just supplying size of the PSF and how many to use for each image" feasible) to do to provide some buffering time for you to reply. Also, don't fear about the help you provide to me, I just have to note it7include you in the refereces section of the paper (it's for "Jugend Forscht", so not an university or such) and also the whole thing will go open source once it is completed. Thanks in advance. Namibj (talk) 18:19, 26 December 2014 (UTC)https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rnt20&action=edit&section=new#[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Speckle aperture masking.png

Thanks for uploading File:Speckle aperture masking.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atmos struct imaging.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Atmos struct imaging.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:19, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sixth Cambridge Survey of Radio Sources for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sixth Cambridge Survey of Radio Sources is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sixth Cambridge Survey of Radio Sources until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. King of Scorpions 23:26, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:School Reunion.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:School Reunion.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:44, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]